De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
In regards to Robert Vansittart:
From the dispatch, he was still regarded as useful, no?
Source: NYTimes June 8, 1939, p. 10
From the dispatch, he was still regarded as useful, no?
Source: NYTimes June 8, 1939, p. 10
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Vansittart meets with Maisky no less!
I guess Vansittart was more than just a figurehead, eh?
Source: NYTimes, May 18, 1939, Front page
I guess Vansittart was more than just a figurehead, eh?
Source: NYTimes, May 18, 1939, Front page
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Regarding the Drax led military mission to Moscow:
High ranking members of the Air Force, Army, & Navy were sent to Moscow.
Source: NYTimes, August 1, 1939, p. 4
High ranking members of the Air Force, Army, & Navy were sent to Moscow.
Source: NYTimes, August 1, 1939, p. 4
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Thanks gebhkgebhk wrote: ↑18 Jan 2022 09:52Hi Ijadw.
With respect, you did not sayWhich, incidentally, is also untrue as Terry Duncan explained in Post 421. What you did say is:that the PM can block a sitting MP from being candidate again for his own party in the same constituencyWhich is completely untrue.Downing Street 10 (= the PM ) can prevent sitting MPs from being again candidate ,

So ljadw...who is spreading misinformation?
-
- Member
- Posts: 8108
- Joined: 29 Dec 2006 20:11
- Location: Poland
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Lot's of Vansittart and meetings with him in "Maisky Diaries" for that period.
19 May
To my surprise, the reply from Moscow arrived on the 18th at 5 p.m. ... As I expected, the reply was brief and unambiguous: unacceptable.
I visited Vansittart in his flat today at 10.30 a.m. He did not seem surprised by our reply. It seems that he was fully prepared for it after our conversation in the evening of 17 May. He merely sighed and uttered, as if to himself:
'Well, it can't be helped. Looks like we'll have to get down to work again and think up something new.' ...
At 7 p.m. Vansittart asked me to drop by at his flat for a few minutes. When I entered the hall, he rushed to greet me and announced excitedly that he had good news to communicate.
The decision had just been taken to ask Seeds to inform the Soviet Government that as a result of the recent exchanges (the British proposal of 8 May and our counter-proposal of 14 May, and my talks with Halifax, Vansittart and others) the positions of the parties have been definitively clarified and the existing difficulties accurately identified.
The British Government would make every effort to overcome these difficulties and hoped to find the appropriate means to do so. However, the new proposals required a special decision by the whole Cabinet and would be adopted at its meeting on 24 May. ... Vansittart hopes that agreement will be reached next week.
I shook my head doubtfully and, taking my leave, teased in a now entirely unofficial manner: 'Admit it, Sir Robert, deep down you are pleased we have taken a firm stand!' Vansittart burst out laughing and exclaimed:
'Perhaps!'
17 May
Yesterday the Vansittarts came over for an 'intimate' lunch. We discussed international affairs at length, and above all the Anglo-Soviet negotiations.
...
Today, at 12.30 in the afternoon, Vansittart urgently summoned me to the FO.
...
This evening, at seven o'clock, Vansittart invited me once again to the FO.
-
- Member
- Posts: 14461
- Joined: 13 Jul 2009 17:50
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
I was talking of 1940,not of 2021 .
And you are doing a wild-goose chase :it is obvious that a Tory PM can not prevent a Labour MP to be candidate again .
And you are doing a wild-goose chase :it is obvious that a Tory PM can not prevent a Labour MP to be candidate again .
-
- Member
- Posts: 14461
- Joined: 13 Jul 2009 17:50
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
High ranking ?
an Admiral,a major general,an air marshal (=lt general of the air force ) .
The NYT proved again its incompetence .
-
- Member
- Posts: 14461
- Joined: 13 Jul 2009 17:50
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Much regret was expressed in competent quarters



Who were these competent quarters ?
The Grand Alliance of Churchill and LG was doomed to fail as every one knows .
Why ?
in 1914 there were two reasons for this Grand Alliance
1 Poland did not exist
2 Germany attacked Russia and not the opposite .If Germany had not attacked Russia,Russia would have remained neutral .
In 1939 the situation was the opposite
1 The existence of Poland had as result that Germany and Russia had no common border,which means that they could not fight against each other
2 Germany did not attack Russia .
If in 1914 Russia did not start a war against Germany,why would Russia start a war against Germany in 1939?
-
- Member
- Posts: 14461
- Joined: 13 Jul 2009 17:50
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
The military delegation had not as aim to seek a deal with the Soviets .Gorque wrote: ↑17 Jan 2022 15:59So basically what you are saying is that you have no evidence to counter the fact that Drax was chosen as a member of a military delegation to seek a deal with the Soviets despite my having provided proof to you. Good to know!ljadw wrote: ↑17 Jan 2022 14:38According to Drax![]()
The PM did not want to have the Soviets on board in case of war,neither did the Poles .Thus :the mission was only propaganda.
Drax was an admiral ,without any competence of land war .
Vansittart had been fired ,was labelled as unstable by Eden and as hostile to HMG's policy .
If Chamberlain wanted to negotiate with the Soviets, he would send Halifax/Cadogan and Gort/Ironside .
Besides :WHY would Chamberlain want to negotiate with the Soviets ? Poland refused,rightly, to negotiate with the Soviets .
And Chamberlain knew very well what the Soviets would demand in exchange for their intervention .![]()
-
- Member
- Posts: 14461
- Joined: 13 Jul 2009 17:50
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
About Churchill's deselection :
''On February 1 1939 Churchill was forced to defend his actions over Munich to avoid deselection organised largely by Ball ''
Source : Churchill's secret enemy (By Jonathan Pile )
And for those who would not know who was Ball :Google Sir Joseph Ball .Ball was a very close and powerful adviser of Chamberlain .
Other opponents of Chamberlain had been eliminated or were in difficulties :
The Duchess of Atholl, Richard Law (son of Bonar Law ),Robert Boothby
Source :Winston Churchill :the Prophet of Truth 1922-1939 .(Martin Gilbert )
''On February 1 1939 Churchill was forced to defend his actions over Munich to avoid deselection organised largely by Ball ''
Source : Churchill's secret enemy (By Jonathan Pile )
And for those who would not know who was Ball :Google Sir Joseph Ball .Ball was a very close and powerful adviser of Chamberlain .
Other opponents of Chamberlain had been eliminated or were in difficulties :
The Duchess of Atholl, Richard Law (son of Bonar Law ),Robert Boothby
Source :Winston Churchill :the Prophet of Truth 1922-1939 .(Martin Gilbert )
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
I suggest you refer to the NYTimes edition of June 8, 1939. I don't intend to do your research for you.ljadw wrote: ↑18 Jan 2022 15:27Much regret was expressed in competent quarters![]()
![]()
![]()
Who were these competent quarters ?
The Grand Alliance of Churchill and LG was doomed to fail as every one knows .
Why ?
in 1914 there were two reasons for this Grand Alliance
1 Poland did not exist
2 Germany attacked Russia and not the opposite .If Germany had not attacked Russia,Russia would have remained neutral .
In 1939 the situation was the opposite
1 The existence of Poland had as result that Germany and Russia had no common border,which means that they could not fight against each other
2 Germany did not attack Russia .
If in 1914 Russia did not start a war against Germany,why would Russia start a war against Germany in 1939?

Last edited by Gorque on 18 Jan 2022 16:20, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
And your evidence to support your position is....where?ljadw wrote: ↑18 Jan 2022 15:30The military delegation had not as aim to seek a deal with the Soviets .Gorque wrote: ↑17 Jan 2022 15:59So basically what you are saying is that you have no evidence to counter the fact that Drax was chosen as a member of a military delegation to seek a deal with the Soviets despite my having provided proof to you. Good to know!ljadw wrote: ↑17 Jan 2022 14:38According to Drax![]()
The PM did not want to have the Soviets on board in case of war,neither did the Poles .Thus :the mission was only propaganda.
Drax was an admiral ,without any competence of land war .
Vansittart had been fired ,was labelled as unstable by Eden and as hostile to HMG's policy .
If Chamberlain wanted to negotiate with the Soviets, he would send Halifax/Cadogan and Gort/Ironside .
Besides :WHY would Chamberlain want to negotiate with the Soviets ? Poland refused,rightly, to negotiate with the Soviets .
And Chamberlain knew very well what the Soviets would demand in exchange for their intervention .![]()
C'mon Ludo, I've provided three articles and you've provided....ZERO.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009 18:20
- Location: Clocktown
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Some good information and another source regarding Vansittart. Thank you wm.wm wrote: ↑18 Jan 2022 15:10
Lot's of Vansittart and meetings with him in "Maisky Diaries" for that period.
19 May
To my surprise, the reply from Moscow arrived on the 18th at 5 p.m. ... As I expected, the reply was brief and unambiguous: unacceptable.
I visited Vansittart in his flat today at 10.30 a.m. He did not seem surprised by our reply. It seems that he was fully prepared for it after our conversation in the evening of 17 May. He merely sighed and uttered, as if to himself:
'Well, it can't be helped. Looks like we'll have to get down to work again and think up something new.' ...
At 7 p.m. Vansittart asked me to drop by at his flat for a few minutes. When I entered the hall, he rushed to greet me and announced excitedly that he had good news to communicate.
The decision had just been taken to ask Seeds to inform the Soviet Government that as a result of the recent exchanges (the British proposal of 8 May and our counter-proposal of 14 May, and my talks with Halifax, Vansittart and others) the positions of the parties have been definitively clarified and the existing difficulties accurately identified.
The British Government would make every effort to overcome these difficulties and hoped to find the appropriate means to do so. However, the new proposals required a special decision by the whole Cabinet and would be adopted at its meeting on 24 May. ... Vansittart hopes that agreement will be reached next week.
I shook my head doubtfully and, taking my leave, teased in a now entirely unofficial manner: 'Admit it, Sir Robert, deep down you are pleased we have taken a firm stand!' Vansittart burst out laughing and exclaimed:
'Perhaps!'17 May
Yesterday the Vansittarts came over for an 'intimate' lunch. We discussed international affairs at length, and above all the Anglo-Soviet negotiations.
...
Today, at 12.30 in the afternoon, Vansittart urgently summoned me to the FO.
...
This evening, at seven o'clock, Vansittart invited me once again to the FO.

-
- Member
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: 25 Feb 2013 20:23
Re: De Gaulle and French betrayal of Poland in Semptember 1939
Admiral, major general and air marshall are high ranks by any measure. So who is being incompetent here? It certainly isn't the NYT.High ranking ?
an Admiral,a major general,an air marshal (=lt general of the air force ) .