german 1. & 2. army 1915 > merged to 4. army?
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004 15:34
- Location: Berlin / Germany
german 1. & 2. army 1915 > merged to 4. army?
could anyone tell me what became of the 1st & 2nd german army after the battle at the marne? I know that another 4th army was formed to prevent the french to get through the lines between the 1. & 2. army (i think at ypern), and a friend of me suggested that maybe the two were merged and some other kompanien added into the 4th?
thx
eva
thx
eva
-
- Member
- Posts: 3438
- Joined: 21 Mar 2002 01:50
- Location: Louisiana, USA
-
- Member
- Posts: 435
- Joined: 04 Mar 2003 22:06
- Location: Mainz, Germany
it looks like the 1st army was disbanded after 17th sept. 1915 (commander at that time Gend d. Inf v. Fabeck ).
the army was reorganized 19th july 1916 (as the scan posted by USAF1986 acknowledges) being formed by the northen units of the 2nd army
not really a merger, more a split of the 2nd army (who recived a new commander the same day too).
source: http://www.lib.byu.edu/~rdh/wwi/1914/gruppew.html
but since von klucks army was overstrenght in 1914, i'm sure the army was reorganized after sept. 1914. does anybody know which army the Tannenberg reinforcement corps were taken from?
the army was reorganized 19th july 1916 (as the scan posted by USAF1986 acknowledges) being formed by the northen units of the 2nd army
not really a merger, more a split of the 2nd army (who recived a new commander the same day too).
source: http://www.lib.byu.edu/~rdh/wwi/1914/gruppew.html
but since von klucks army was overstrenght in 1914, i'm sure the army was reorganized after sept. 1914. does anybody know which army the Tannenberg reinforcement corps were taken from?
-
- Member
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:46
- Location: United Kingdom
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004 15:34
- Location: Berlin / Germany
-
- Member
- Posts: 435
- Joined: 04 Mar 2003 22:06
- Location: Mainz, Germany
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004 15:34
- Location: Berlin / Germany
it they were taken from the first it would fit with the 1st army being almost gone during the battle at the somme. but I doubt that Moltke was that stupid to take all the reinforcement for the eastern front from one army at the western...dead-cat wrote: [...] they were taken from right wing, which would mean 1st and 2nd army but i don't have the book handy so i cannot check.
-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004 15:34
- Location: Berlin / Germany
-
- Member
- Posts: 435
- Joined: 04 Mar 2003 22:06
- Location: Mainz, Germany
it they were taken from the first it would fit with the 1st army being almost gone during the battle at the somme. but I doubt that Moltke was that stupid to take all the reinforcement for the eastern front from one army at the western...
somme? i think you meant marne? the first army was around 250 000 or so, strong with a regular army size being around 100 000.
2 corps means 4 divisions or around 50 000 men. if you take 1 from the 1st and 1 from the 2nd army that still leaves the 1st with around 225 000.
besides Moltke allready WAS that stupid to change the right wing /left wing ratio from 7:1 to 3:1 and thus ruined the Schlieffen plan. so i wouldn't completly rule that out

-
- Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 09 Jan 2004 15:34
- Location: Berlin / Germany
nah, the marne was 1914, while the 1st army was disbanded & reorganised in 1915. (or did I get something wrong? thought that was the resumee from the posted above...)dead-cat wrote: somme? i think you meant marne?
do you have detailed dates & numbers about the 1st & 2nd army during the war? like exactly where they were stationed, who were lienenants and stuff?dead-cat wrote: the first army was around 250 000 or so, strong with a regular army size being around 100 000.
2 corps means 4 divisions or around 50 000 men. if you take 1 from the 1st and 1 from the 2nd army that still leaves the 1st with around 225 000.
dead-cat wrote: besides Moltke allready WAS that stupid to change the right wing /left wing ratio from 7:1 to 3:1 and thus ruined the Schlieffen plan. so i wouldn't completly rule that out

-
- Member
- Posts: 28628
- Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
- Location: Australia
The two Corps sent East in late August 1914 were the Guard Reserve Corps from 2nd Army and the 11th Corps from 3rd Army.Both had been involved in the seige of Namur which fell on the 25th August.
1st Army also provided the 3rd Reserve Corps for the reduction of Antwerp and initially 4th Reserve Corps for the occupation of Brussels;the latter unit bringing up the rear and right flank was first in action at the Battle of the Marne.
1st Army also provided the 3rd Reserve Corps for the reduction of Antwerp and initially 4th Reserve Corps for the occupation of Brussels;the latter unit bringing up the rear and right flank was first in action at the Battle of the Marne.
-
- Member
- Posts: 435
- Joined: 04 Mar 2003 22:06
- Location: Mainz, Germany
thanx alot Moulded.
i belive to have read that the 2nd army was similar in number with the 1st. can anyone confirm/infirm that? does anyone have realtively exact numbers for the strenghts of the different armies in Aug. 1914?
i belive to have read that the 2nd army was similar in number with the 1st. can anyone confirm/infirm that? does anyone have realtively exact numbers for the strenghts of the different armies in Aug. 1914?
sorry no, i need to dig when i'm back home. till' then maybe someone can help?do you have detailed dates & numbers about the 1st & 2nd army during the war? like exactly where they were stationed, who were lienenants and stuff?
no i was still talking about 1914. i said, i belive the 1st army, being overstreght, was reorganized when things settled a bit on the western front in nov/dec. 1914.nah, the marne was 1914, while the 1st army was disbanded & reorganised in 1915. (or did I get something wrong? thought that was the resumee from the posted above...)