Is that supposed to be some sort of joke?

Hitler was a head of state and heads of state met other heads of state, not political leaders .George L Gregory wrote: ↑05 May 2022 09:47That’s just more claptrap from you. It was and is normal for leaders of different countries to meet each other.
Who was the head of the Soviet Union with complete control as the dictator since April 1925?ljadw wrote: ↑05 May 2022 12:02Hitler was a head of state and heads of state met other heads of state, not political leaders .George L Gregory wrote: ↑05 May 2022 09:47That’s just more claptrap from you. It was and is normal for leaders of different countries to meet each other.
Hitler was also a head of government and in this function he met other heads of government .
Before WW 2 and even during WW 2 ,there was a big difference between both : before the war FDR met George VI in his quality of head of state, during the war he met Churchill in his quality of head of government .
On October 25, 1917 (according to the Gregorian calendar, November 7, 1917), as a result of a successful uprising known as the Great October Socialist Revolution, the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie (capital) was overthrown in Russia and the dictatorship of the Proletariat was established.George L Gregory wrote: ↑07 May 2022 11:13
Who was the head of the Soviet Union with complete control as the dictator since April 1925?
This argument doesn't work in the AH case because he met, inter alia, Chamberlain who was a political leader not a head of state. He met Mussolini many times. Also not a head of state.Hitler was a head of state and heads of state met other heads of state, not political leaders .
And Stalin was, unquestionably, in practice the head of the government of the Soviet Union - which is why he was often titled 'President' outside the Soviet Union.Hitler was also a head of government and in this function he met other heads of government.
How and by whom Stalin was called (considered) outside the USSR does not matter.
One cannot compare the Communist party and the Nazi party .gebhk wrote: ↑07 May 2022 13:40Ultimately, the point is that people met and meet who they wanted to/needed to/had to meet. Clearly Hilter and/or Stalin didn't. In which case another question might be why Hitler felt the need to meet all those other leaders?
Were overtures made by one or the other for a meeting that were rebuffed?
Hi IJadwThis argument doesn't work in the AH case because he met, inter alia, Chamberlain who was a political leader not a head of state. He met Mussolini many times. Also not a head of state.Hitler was a head of state and heads of state met other heads of state, not political leaders .And Stalin was, unquestionably, in practice the head of the government of the Soviet Union - which is why he was often titled 'President' outside the Soviet Union.Hitler was also a head of government and in this function he met other heads of government.
The argument also somewhat ignores the fact that as well as being head of state, and head of government, Hitler was also the leader of the Nazi party just as Stalin was the leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
If we are discussing why someone from outside the USSR did not visit Stalin, then I would suggest it rather does!How and by whom Stalin was called (considered) outside the USSR does not matter.
It is unproven that they admired each others brutality .George L Gregory wrote: ↑07 May 2022 16:55With all due respect Yuri, the fact was that I was exposing ljadw‘s ignorance. Hitler met many people who were not the head of the State of the countries they came from and were often just simply politicians and/or political leaders.
It’s a legitimate question to ask why Hitler and Stalin never met. They both admired each other’s brutality and Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were neutral for give or take two years.
AFAIK, Hitler and Stalin never even spoke to each other.
How many heads of state did meet Stalin ?George L Gregory wrote: ↑07 May 2022 11:13Who was the head of the Soviet Union with complete control as the dictator since April 1925?ljadw wrote: ↑05 May 2022 12:02Hitler was a head of state and heads of state met other heads of state, not political leaders .George L Gregory wrote: ↑05 May 2022 09:47That’s just more claptrap from you. It was and is normal for leaders of different countries to meet each other.
Hitler was also a head of government and in this function he met other heads of government .
Before WW 2 and even during WW 2 ,there was a big difference between both : before the war FDR met George VI in his quality of head of state, during the war he met Churchill in his quality of head of government .
.One cannot compare the Communist party and the Nazi party
I am pretty sure Tehran is not in the USSR.Stalin did not leave the USSR til 1945
You are wrong. It has been proven by their own words.
I forgot about Tehran ,but still Tehran was the capital of a country occupied by Britain and the USSR .Why was there no meeting in Cairo or Delhi ? Simply because there was no Soviet presence in these cities while in 1941 the Red Army advanced to the suburbs of Tehran .gebhk wrote: ↑07 May 2022 17:17.One cannot compare the Communist party and the Nazi party
That is a nonsense. You can compare any two or more things. However, regardless of how the two compare and contrast (that is another discussion) that is immaterial since no one (apart from yourself it seems) has raised the issue. The only thing that matters is that Stalin and Hitler were unquestionably the leaders of their countries' respective, ruling parties.I am pretty sure Tehran is not in the USSR.Stalin did not leave the USSR til 1945