OVERLORD and ANVIL with the February 1944 compromise on landing craft allocation

Discussions on alternate history, including events up to 20 years before today. Hosted by Terry Duncan.
daveshoup2MD
Member
Posts: 1541
Joined: 01 Feb 2020 18:10
Location: Coral and brass

Re: OVERLORD and ANVIL with the February 1944 compromise on landing craft allocation

Post by daveshoup2MD » 21 Feb 2022 18:41

Richard Anderson wrote:
18 May 2021 20:14
Sheldrake wrote:
18 May 2021 19:15
As far as the Germans were concerned Europe was one big theatre of operations. Troops in France could be on the Eastern Front or in Italy in 48 hours and vice versa. The distinction between ETO and MTO is artificial.
True, but a bit exaggerated. It depended a bit on the types of troops, the availability of trains, and the like. II. SS-Panzerkorps is illustrative. The corps along with 9. and 10. SS-Pz.-Div. were on the Ostfront as of 6 June and were ordered to return to Normandy on 11 June. By 18 June, 27 trains with corps troops and 9. SS-Pz.-Div. were in the area of Ob.West and 21 arrived in Nancy (ULTRA HW5/510, CX/MSS/T224/117, 24 June 1944). By 21 June, 78 trains were in the area with 62 unloaded at Nancy and 10 unloaded at Dreuex and west of Paris (ULTRA HW5/511, CX/MSS/T225/9, 25 June 1944). For 10. SS, by 21 June, 62 trains were in the area of Ob. West with 47 unloaded at Nancy-Saarbrücken (ULTRA HW5/511, CX/MSS/T225/9, 25 June 1944). They then had to motor to Normandy, with 9. SS arriving at the front 26 June and 10. SS the next day.
48 hours vis a vis 360 hours (15 days) is a
"bit exaggerated"?
Okay. :roll:

Richard Anderson
Member
Posts: 5303
Joined: 01 Jan 2016 21:21
Location: Bremerton, Washington

Re: OVERLORD and ANVIL with the February 1944 compromise on landing craft allocation

Post by Richard Anderson » 22 Feb 2022 01:18

daveshoup2MD wrote:
21 Feb 2022 18:41
48 hours vis a vis 360 hours (15 days) is a
"bit exaggerated"?
Okay. :roll:
Um :roll: right back atcha. It took you nearly a year to miss the gentle sarcasm and respond? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Richard C. Anderson Jr.

American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell

Carl Schwamberger
Host - Allied sections
Posts: 9582
Joined: 02 Sep 2006 20:31
Location: USA

Re: OVERLORD and ANVIL with the February 1944 compromise on landing craft allocation

Post by Carl Schwamberger » 22 Feb 2022 19:29

Anyone recall the OB for Operation Margarethe? At least two Pz Div were withdrawn from France for it? Occurs to me mid March would have been a date for Op ANVIL just to screw with German deployment for Op M.

daveshoup2MD
Member
Posts: 1541
Joined: 01 Feb 2020 18:10
Location: Coral and brass

Re: OVERLORD and ANVIL with the February 1944 compromise on landing craft allocation

Post by daveshoup2MD » 23 Feb 2022 03:27

Richard Anderson wrote:
22 Feb 2022 01:18
daveshoup2MD wrote:
21 Feb 2022 18:41
48 hours vis a vis 360 hours (15 days) is a
"bit exaggerated"?
Okay. :roll:
Um :roll: right back atcha. It took you nearly a year to miss the gentle sarcasm and respond? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Some of us have day jobs, you know? ;)

Return to “What if”